Terry Richardson is one of my favourite photographers. While he has shot some of the most famous peeps on the planet (see here), his style is gritty, graphic and stark.

Some butthurt fags whinge because he encourages his subjects to ‘participate’ in the shoots (sooks here), yet I cannot understand how anyone could expect anything less.

If you are a model, and you get booked for a Richardson shoot, and it’s not for product (Gucci, Miu Miu, Hilfiger etc), and it’s not about YOU because you aren’t famous, then it must be for HIS own artistic intent, yes? Well his style is WELL documented (and lauded).

SO, if you aren’t willing to get nude, or jerk him off if he suggests it, DON’T DO THE SHOOT.

“oh, but many of them are young and easily manipulated by a photographer as widely respected as him”..
FUCK OFF. Refer to the paragraph above.

‘Sides, the dude is up there with Clooney in the style stakes..

And he works hard:

Get off the man’s balls, bitches.
What you see is what you get.

Reminds me of a recent post on here about a whale.. Oh the whale killed a lady!
Why do people act surprised when he is clearly what he says he is?

So, should we seriously be suprised?

Or more to the point, should we GIVE A SHIT?!  Well, I certainly don’t give a shit… Some B grade, recently (somehow) Oscar winning actress marries the tattooed badboy Jesse James, causing an initial ‘hoo-hah’, which quickly died off when there was no filthy sex tape or stories of orgies or aborted babies.

I digress, the point I was TRYING to make was, who gives a shit that an overrated dickhead cheated on his overrated fucking wife with some tattooed filthy dirty tattooed spunkfest named Michelle Bombshell….

I’m honestly more interested in this Japanese girls’ bowel movements.